(Note: I altered the question because the first one I wrote was, well, stupid on my part).
From Fast Company
Democrats and Republicans are waging ideological war on the healthcare front using weapons of social media:

Obama's healthcare site, which launched last month, has just begun to gain a critical mass of user-generated content. Called "
Health Care Stories for America," it features an interactive Google map that pinpoints a few hundred personal stories about experiences with the American health-care system from across the country, and allows users to search by zipcode to see stories near them. Browsing the "recent stories" is a relatively apolitical exercise in heartbreak: Users have filled out paragraphs about a father lost to HMO coverage-denial, a sister suffering from a ski accident; a small-business employee with Hepatitis C. You can share your own story, tweet others, or publish one to Facebook; you can also donate money to
Obama's cause.
The Republican response, called the
Barack Obama Experiment, is a kind of video-blog that aims to make readers "nervous" about the Obama plan, according to Politico. The title of the site comes from a memo by an RNC consultant who has been advising party leaders on how to slow down the White House's march toward reform, including the controversial "public option" where the government would compete with private insurance companies.
The site, sparse and basic and without any of the flash of Obama's expert Web projects, acts as a cache of YouTube videos of party chairman Michael Steele's appearances on television, with a smattering of commercials. To be exact: two Steele videos and one commercial. Yes, there are only three videos on the site, which was launched four days ago, and doesn't look as if it's been updated since. (
Read more from Fast Company)
Take a look at the two sites and consider this simple yet loaded question:
Who is more persuasive: Democrats or Republicans in their use of Social Media? Share your thoughts here